The “Axolotl-ization” of Mexico City: An analysis of the public response to the Mexico City government’s political use of the axolotl as an institutional communication strategy.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38056/2026aiccXXXIII736

Keywords:

citizenship, Memes, oppositional readings, resistance, civic digital activism

Abstract

This article analyzes the public response to the Mexico City (CDMX) government's institutional communication strategy, which incorporated the political use of the axolotl in urban spaces as a narrative device to articulate discourses on identity in the context of the 2026 World Cup. Our analysis focuses on digital posts that critically engage with this initiative. We employed a qualitative methodology using multimodal analysis to examine 117 posts on Instagram and X that challenged these actions. The findings indicate that citizens transformed symbols imposed by the CDMX government into tools for political critique via memes—shaped by an oppositional narrative (Hall, 2004)—employing two tactics that functioned as forms of algorithmic resistance through satire and irony.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maricela Portillo Sánchez, Universidad Iberoamericana

Full-time faculty member in the Department of Communication at Universidad Iberoamericana. PhD in Audiovisual Communication from Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Member of the National System of Researchers (Level 2) since 2007. She served as president of the Mexican Association of Communication Researchers (AMIC) from 2009 to 2011. Since 2006, she has coordinated the Working Group on Youth and Communication Studies within the same association. Her research focuses on Political Communication (public opinion formation, the spectacularization of politics, and youth political culture) and Youth Cultures (media construction of youth, technology use, and political participation). Scholar in the field of communication studies, specializing in youth cultures and political communication. Her academic foundation is deeply rooted in international and interdisciplinary training. She holds a PhD in Audiovisual Communication from the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, a Master’s degree in Communication from the Universidad Iberoamericana, and a Postgraduate Degree in Youth Studies from the Universidad de Lleida.

Beatriz De Urquijo Isoard, Universidad Iberoamericana

Beatriz holds a Master's degree in International Communication from Leeds Beckett University (England) and Hanze University of Applied Sciences (the Netherlands), as well as another Master's degree in Education and Communication from the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (Spain). She has taught courses and seminars in the Netherlands, Germany, and Mexico, where she currently serves as a part-time faculty member at Universidad La Salle México. She has also served as a judge for the AMCO Awards (2022) and as an evaluator for the Lasallian Research, Development, and Innovation Competition (CLIDI) (2021, 2022). She is a member of EUPRERA's PR Research Network and has published in indexed journals, book chapters, and conference papers in Mexico and Europe. She is currently pursuing a PhD at Universidad Iberoamericana on an academic excellence scholarship and is serving as an editor of the book "History and Development of Corporate Communication in Mexico," in collaboration with AMCO and CONEICC.

References

Bibliografía

Aruguete, N. (2017). Agenda building. Revisión de la literatura sobre el proceso de la construcción de la agenda mediática. Signo y Pensamiento. 70, 38-54.

http://doi:10.11144/Javeriana.syp36-70.abrl

Calvo, E. & Aruguete, N. (2020). Fake news, trolls y otros encantos. Cómo funcionan (para bien o para mal) las redes sociales. Siglo XXI.

Córdoba, J. & Gago, C. (2019). Los ránquines de ciudades mundiales: ¿dónde se posiciona Ciudad de México?. Investigaciones Geográficas, (100). https://doi.org/10.1450/rig.60019

De Certeau, M. (1996). La invención de lo cotidiano. Universidad Iberoamericana.

Escudero Chauvel, L. (2024). Digital Studies, Memes y producción de sentido. deSignis, 41, 25–46. https://doi.org/10.35659/designis.i41p25-46

Forristal, L. J., & Lehto, X. Y. (2009). Place branding with native species: Personality as a criterion. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 5(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2009.16

García Canclini, N. (2004) Diferentes, desiguales y desconectados. Gedisa.

Garrido, Verónica M. (2026, 12 de mayo). Clara Brugada 'ajolotiza' Ciudad de México para ponerla a punto del Mundial. El País. https://elpais.com/mexico/2026-05-12/clara-brugada-ajolotiza-ciudad-de-mexico-para-ponerla-a-punto-del-mundial.html

Gramsci, A. (1981). Cuadernos de la cárcel. Ediciones Era.

Hall, S. (2004). Codificación y descodificación en el discurso televisivo. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 9, 210-236.

Herrera Aguilar, J. & O’Quinn, J. (2019). El papel de las redes sociales en la gestión de un gobierno independiente: la comunicación política a través de Facebook del gobierno de Jaime Rodríguez Calderón. Espacios Públicos. 56(22), 85-105.

Huaman-Ramirez, R., Merunka, D., & Maaninou, N. (2023). Destination personality effects on tourists’ attitude: the role of self-congruity and ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 31(1), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2021.1874488

Karam, T. (2026). Tácticas y resistencias en la comunicación digital: una relectura de Michel de Certeau. Chasqui, 160, 159-176. https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v1i160.5233

Kumar, V. y Nayak, J.K. (2014). The measurement and conceptualization of destination personality. Tourism Management Perspectives, 12, 88-93.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2014.09.002

Labrecque, A. (2020). Celebrity endorsement in social media contexts: understanding the role of parasocial interactions and the need to belong. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 7(37), 895-908. http://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2019-3474

Llonto Caicedo, et. al. (2025). Urban planning effectiveness and citizen satisfaction. A systematic literature review. F1000Research, 13, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157550.2

Lee, J. (2026). “Cute saves the world!”: Animal Internet Celebrities’ cute activism in the #adoptdon’tshop animal rescue campaign on social media. Social Movement Studies, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2024.2421973

Moreno, A. (2026, 2 de junio). Aprobación de Brugada disminuye a 56% en mayo, según Encuesta EF. El Financiero.

https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/cdmx/2026/06/02/disminuye-aprobacion-de-brugada-a-56-en-mayo-segun-encuesta-ef/

Pérez Salazar, G. (2019). Teoría del encuadre y plataformas sociodigitales de interacción: un análisis de coyuntura. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. 236(64), 333-354.

https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2019.236.68820.

Portillo, M. (2006). Juventud, identidad y ciudad: algunos apuntos para la reflexión. Andamios. 2(4), 219-238.

Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Sued, G. (2021). Métodos digitales para estudiar la cultura y la vida digital: fotografías mexicanas en Instagram en Flores-Márquez, D. & González Reyes, R. (Coord.) La imaginación metodológica. Coordenadas, rutas y apuestas para el estudio de la cultura digital. Tintable.

Treré, E. (2016). Distorsiones tecnopolíticas: represión y resistencia algorítmica del activismo ciudadano en la era del big data. Trípodos, 39, 35-51. https://tripodos.com/index.php/Facultat_Comunicacio_Blanquerna/article/view/379/551

Published

2026-10-13

How to Cite

Portillo Sánchez, M., & De Urquijo Isoard, B. (2026). The “Axolotl-ization” of Mexico City: An analysis of the public response to the Mexico City government’s political use of the axolotl as an institutional communication strategy. Anuario De Investigación De La Comunicación CONEICC, (XXXIII). https://doi.org/10.38056/2026aiccXXXIII736